Construction Safety: Best Practices in Training
Hispanic Workers - 02/18/2004
A safety training program at the Dallas/Ft. Worth airport offers
hope in the effort to stem a surge in fatalities among Hispanic
construction workers.
by James L. Nash
Hispanics now comprise more than 20 percent of construction
employees. "The Hispanic proportion of the construction industry
work force has grown rapidly and we expect this will continue," says
Justin Crandol, director of safety and health services at the
national office of Associated General Contractors. "This raises some
of the most important safety issues facing AGC and the construction
industry."
Those issues focus on finding ways to address the language and
cultural differences in the Hispanic population so that construction
employers can keep Hispanic workers safe. From 1997 to 2002, total
fatalities in the construction industry rose by slightly more than 1
percent, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. During this
same period, the number of Hispanic fatalities in the industry shot
up by almost 50 percent.
One bright light in this bleak picture is a unique, 40-hour
training course being used in the $2.6 billion Dallas/Forth Worth
Airport (DFWA) expansion project. The airport's safety training
program (STP) appears to be breaking down barriers of language,
literacy and culture – and having a big impact on safety.
Such success couldn't come at a better time for Texas Hispanic
construction workers. In 2000, 277 Hispanic workers lost their lives
in construction-related incidents; 81 of these fatalities occurred
in Texas, while 36 took place in California and 20 in Florida.
Such statistics prompted the Hispanic Contractors Association de
Tejas (HCAT), an association formed in 1997 that now has six
chapters in the state, to recently declare a "state of emergency"
for Hispanic construction workers in Texas.
The problem is even more acute in the Dallas-Ft. Worth area.
Since 2000, Dallas-Ft. Worth has had more fatalities in construction
than any other metropolitan area in the nation, according to Javier
Arias, chairman of HCAT. Arias said HCAT has just declared a special
state of emergency for the Dallas-Ft. Worth area.
Arias is clear about what he sees as the solution to this
problem. "It's about training, communication and culture," he says.
"Our main task is to train and provide information to the workers in
the proper language before they need it.
An Admirable Safety Record
If Texas is facing tough challenges in the safety of its Hispanic
workers, DFWA's Capital Development Program (CDP), as the airport
expansion is called, may have one of the best construction training
programs in the country. The program, which began in September 2002
and will entail 23 million man-hours of construction, has an
admirable safety record. In addition to an injury rate far below the
national average for a heavy construction site, DFWA is saving
additional money on its project-controlled insurance program (PCIP).
The average cost of a workers' compensation claim is more than 15
percent lower than the Texas average.
"It's a good program out there [at DFWA]" comments Dean Wingo,
OSHA's area director for the Ft. Worth office. "What's unusual is
the education they require everyone to have. Even on larger jobs, I
don't see that."
Wingo adds that an OSHA inspection of the site 1 year ago turned
up just 16 companies with violations of agency safety rules, out of
180 contractors on site at the time. "That's pretty low. Usually, we
find about 50 percent of contractors or subcontractors have a
violation." Most of the violations had to do with unsafe acts,
rather than unsafe conditions: employees who had unhooked fall
protection equipment, or were under a suspended load.
"Even with excellent training, you still have to deal with the
human factor," explains Wingo.
The safety training program is not the only reason DFWA has
compiled a good safety record. One of the biggest challenges in
construction safety is inducing smaller subcontractors to take
safety as seriously as larger companies. But by utilizing a
"wrap-up" insurance program, the airport project enforces a single,
universal safety program for all subcontractors at the worksite,
according to Keith Smith, EHS manager for Dallas-based Austin
Commercial, one of the general contractors for the project.
Wingo credits the universal safety and incentive programs as
important contributing factors to DFWA's low injury rates.
But what is most unique about DFWA's safety program is its
mandatory 40-hour bilingual safety training program. What lessons
does it teach those who want to improve the safety of non-English
speaking construction workers?
Bilingual Construction Training: Best Practices
The safety training program was developed by BEST Institute Inc.
of Garland, Texas, in conjunction with the two primary contractors
at the airport project. So far, nearly 13,000 students have taken
the course; roughly half took it in Spanish. Those involved with the
program cite these elements as integral to its success:
Speak the workers' language. According to OSHA's
interpretation of 1910.1200(h), when employers have a training
requirement, they must provide it in a language the worker can
understand. Teaching in the appropriate language, however, is only
the beginning. Successful training of Latino workers must be
sensitive to differences in culture and education that distinguish
Latinos from other workers – and that even divide Latinos among
themselves. Really reaching workers, affecting their behavior and
attitudes, entails more than language fluency.
"We recruit instructors who are from the ethnic groups we are
training," explains Joseph Halcarz, BEST's president. Both
instructors and curriculum developers are bilingual, and Halcarz
says he tries to use instructors who have worked in
construction.
Part of the training involves helping English-speaking and
Spanish-speaking workers to understand basic construction terms,
according to Javier Maldonado, a manager of field engineers who took
the 40-hour course. "The course doesn't try to make you fluent in
the other language, but it does teach you to say 'peligro' [danger]
or 'cuidado' [careful], if you see someone with his back to
dangerous equipment," says Maldonado. "Knowing a few key words could
save someone's life."
The classroom instruction is backed up with printed material
workers can take on the job. OSHA's Wingo singles out this part of
the STP for special praise. "I think it's pretty innovative that
they give workers these cards with Spanish to English on one side,
and English to Spanish on the other."
Address cultural differences. Here's how Arias explains
one key cultural difference between Hispanic and English-speaking
workers that can have huge safety implications. "Maybe it's
machismo, maybe it's because our fathers told us if you want to help
someone you don't say no, or maybe it's fear we'll lose our job, but
often we don't want to say, 'No.'"
Wingo contends Hispanic workers are often very loyal and
dedicated, and explains the difference between them and Americans
somewhat differently. "If a hammer falls apart, you'll find the
Latino has found a way to tape it back together, whereas an American
worker will come to you and say, 'You gave me this piece of crap and
I can't do my job!'"
Whatever the reason, the reluctance of many Latinos to challenge
authority means they may agree to do unsafe jobs, or not stop
co-workers from risky behavior. This cultural aversion to saying no
may well be one factor behind the high fatality rates for Hispanic
workers.
"Employees learn through this course they won't get fired for
reporting unsafe acts or conditions," says Maldonado. To encourage
this kind of behavior, the airport set up a 'hotline,' so workers
who call can do so confidentially.
Maldonado reports that many Latino workers on the project now
feel comfortable about approaching others to remind them to wear
safety glasses or hardhats, even those who are "higher up." But he
points out that for this practice to be successful, cultural
differences – even among Latinos – must be understood and
respected.
"For example, some workers, such as those from Panama, may want
to be greeted first instead of just told, 'You are doing something
wrong,'" explains Maldonado, who is bilingual and Texas-born.
Don't skimp on training. Halcarz believes that in order to
alter ingrained cultural and work practices, a 24-hour course is the
absolute minimum, although a longer period is preferable. "The first
day, people are still close-minded, but by the third day, we start
to see attitudinal change, especially because we use non-traditional
instructional methods." The 40-hour course used at DFWA is not
cheap: about $500 tuition per student, not counting the workers'
wages paid for by the CDP.
Verify learning. Halcarz asserts what any experienced
teacher knows: you should never assume just because a lesson has
been delivered that the information has been received.
Well aware of the need to verify that a lesson has been learned,
BEST figured out how to turn a problem into a solution. "We couldn't
use written tests due to the literacy problem, so we took a
hands-on, 'Montessori' approach for adults," he explains. "We're
about learning, not teaching."
Students at the airport project learn by doing. The instructor
demonstrates a skill such as the proper use of fall protection
equipment. Then the students duplicate the lesson in a special
classroom "laboratory" until they get it right.
"Evaluation is based on competency. They show you they can do it
right in the lab," says Halcarz.
Follow-up. No training course, however effective, can
provide permanent inoculation from occupational hazards. "We've
learned some things as the program has grown," acknowledges D.W.
Garrett, PCIP safety manager. "We now have a continuous quality
improvement process that looks at how the training has affected
employees on the line, to gauge our strengths and weaknesses." There
is additional training to address those weaknesses.
Weekly safety meetings are used to reinforce lessons from the STP
and to address new job hazards as they emerge. In addition, workers
and subcontractors are coached and educated to follow safety rules.
They are disciplined, or even terminated, if they do not.
"We also have a 'pre-task plan' means of communicating to our
employees, sometimes in writing, before doing a job, so they
understand the work better," says Austin Commercial's Smith. "This
is always done in English and Spanish – something that is
super-important to this project."
With respect to follow-up, though, Halcarz faulted the CDP's
program for not being dynamic enough. "I think DFWA could do a
better job of altering the course content as the project advances
and changes," he comments. The job hazards change with the work, and
workers would benefit from learning more about how to recognize the
emerging perils they confront.
Wider Application?
The expansion of DFWA is a big, publicly funded construction
project. Can private companies use DFWA's ambitious training
program, and is it applicable to smaller jobs?
The STP was originally developed by BEST, and the two primary
general contractors working at DFWA: Austin Commercial and Hensel
Phelps. Spokesmen for both general contractors say they are
considering adapting the course for use in other projects.
Because the airport has a high level of self-insurance through
its PCIP, it can save money directly through lower injuries and
workers' compensation costs. Other large projects that can afford to
self-insure are looking for ways to cut injuries and save money,
according to Wingo, who adds some companies have told him
controlling losses helps production and improves quality.
"But lots of companies that aren't large don't think they can do
this," Wingo explains. "You do a big job and expect losses and don't
look at controlling accidents as a potential source of profit." Even
one serious incident can result in higher workers' compensation for
3 years, but the cost of the problem, as well as the benefit of
avoiding it, is delayed. The cost of an ambitious training program,
however, is immediate.
Still, Wingo hopes DFWA's expansion project is setting an example
others will follow. "I'd like every construction project to operate
the way they do," he says.
- James L Nash
